Thursday, December 13, 2012

Literature Review #5

1) http://media1.podtech.net/media/2005/11/PID_000145/Podtech_Paul_Master_of_IT_Paul_Kim_Stanford_University_2005-11-09_John_Furrier_home.jpg

2)Kim, P. (2010). Evolution in the 21st Century Higher Education Ecosystem. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.),Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010.

3) The article talks about the rise of new species of college in the higher education system. Kim talks about the recent technological trends and challenges faced by traditional institutions and argues that these resulted in the rise of new non-traditional colleges. These colleges, he argues, are different than the traditional university we know. They are flexible in their schedule so that they can attract non-traditional students, those with schedule conflicts. They also eagerly adapt technology in lecturing so that it will cost less.

4)Paul Kim is a professor at Stanford University. He is the assistant dean for Information Technology and CTO.


5)non-traditional students: students who have work, family obligations. These students are different in that they have conflicting schedules with regular classes offered by traditional institutions. So, they are attracted to for-profit or private universities which make it easier for them attend due to their flexible schedules.

evolution: the need to change for survival

6)
“Darwin proposed the idea that organisms adapt and evolve through natural selection, creating particular ecological niches and eventually resulting in the emergence of new species”

This quote explains the evolutionary theory, which I implement to higher education system. The challenges, growing demand and lack of public funding, are overcome by change, which is brought by privatization efforts. The change eventually results in a new species. In the higher education sense, the new species is the ‘efficient university’, corporate in its ways, concerned with efficiency and numbers, rather than quality.

“A business or industry, as a living organism, often must evolve (i.e., to overcome or even leverage changes) in order to seek higher efficiencies and ensure its long-term sustainability” (Kim 5:04)

Change is constant. So, organisms must adapt to this change to survive. Here, Kim argues that organizations and the industries are the same way. The higher education system goes through a similar change and adaptation period to ensure its long-term sustainability.

7)This source is important because it deals with a similar topic to mine, specifically rise of new species in the higher education system.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Research Blog #10

Abstract:
The recent trend of privatization is radically changing US higher education system. Adoption of corporate practices present a structural change in the system, affecting the goals and priorities of universities. Privatization is the system's way of overcoming challenges. This paper aims to implement the theory of evolution to introduction of privatization to the higher education system. It argues that privatization was introduced to overcome challenges with regards to decreasing public funding and growing demand. In that sense, privatization represents the change higher education went through as part of its evolutionary process. Privatization, however, was overdone to the point that it took over the whole system, thereby losing its evolutionary character and becoming an invader. Adverse effects include tuition hikes, loss of autonomy by the academe, and lower quality education compared to traditional institutions.

Link to paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkrtpHOACklwKgsBhFh6CK-BElK4hMdVsXNMaNzhLic/edit



Bibliography:
Haupt, Alexander. "The Evolution Of Public Spending On Higher Education In A Democracy." European Journal Of Political Economy 28.4 (n.d.): 557.
Jamshidi, Laleh; Arasteh, Hamidreza; Naveh Ebrahim, Abdolrahim. "Developmental Patterns Of Privatization In Higher Education: A Comparative Study." Higher Education 64.6 (n.d.): 789-803.
Kim, P. (2010). Evolution in the 21st Century Higher Education Ecosystem. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.),Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010.
Kinser, Kevin; Levy, Daniel C.; Casillas, Juan Carlos Silas; Bernasconi, Andrés; Slantcheva-Durst, Snejana; Otieno, Wycliffe; Lane, Jason E.; Praphamontripong, Prachayani; Zumeta, William; LaSota, Robin. "The Global Growth Of Private Higher Education." ASHE Higher Education Report 36.3 (n.d.): 1.
Martin, Ben R. "Are Universities And University Research Under Threat? Towards An Evolutionary Model Of University Speciation." Cambridge Journal Of Economics 36.3 (n.d.): 543.
Meister, Bob. “Debt and Taxes: Can the Financial Industry Save Public Universities?”
NEA Higher Education Research Center.  “Higher Education and Privatization.”  NEA Update.  10.2 (March 2004).
Newfield, Christopher. “Reinventing Public Universities: From Funding Deadlock to Bootleg U.” Western Humanities Review 65.3 (n.d.): 6
            Rabovsky, Thomas. “Accountability in Higher Education: Exploring Impacts on State Budgets and Institutional Spending Patterns” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory  22.4 (n.d.): 675-700
Weerts, David J.; Ronca, Justin M. "Understanding Differences In State Support For Higher Education Across States, Sectors, And Institutions: A Longitudinal Study." Journal Of Higher Education 83.2 (n.d.): 155.

Research Blog# 9

The visual does well to explain the current situation with regards to student debt. Students go to college so they can climb up the social ladder. With enormous student debts, however, they are tied down, unable to attain the welfare they desire.